<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the 64bit desktop really still so far off?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/</link>
	<description>If the world was perfect, it wouldn&#039;t be.      - Yogi Berra</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:37:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James McPherson</title>
		<link>http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>James McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have no problems with flash inside firefox3 on OpenSolaris. Ditto for webex. I don&#039;t use skype, and if I wanted to try the VoIP thing I&#039;d got with ekiga. I believe you can also run skype inside an lx-branded zone. You might even be able to run it inside VirtualBox. You know that OpenSolaris is a tier-1 host platform for VirtualBox, right?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problems with flash inside firefox3 on OpenSolaris. Ditto for webex. I don&#8217;t use skype, and if I wanted to try the VoIP thing I&#8217;d got with ekiga. I believe you can also run skype inside an lx-branded zone. You might even be able to run it inside VirtualBox. You know that OpenSolaris is a tier-1 host platform for VirtualBox, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Antoniades</title>
		<link>http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Antoniades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love opensolaris - I do! - but the problem I run into there is still a lack of third-party or community support (so far). Skype? Flash? Webex? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@192.18.101.5 - You are right, I really don&#039;t care about application &quot;bitness&quot; if it&#039;s not using &gt;4G of RAM (and nothing should on this box!). It&#039;s the &quot;new source of instability&quot; that I mind. Maybe it&#039;s 32bit Skype accessing a 64bit Video4Linux layer - I don&#039;t pretend to know. But more things broke.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love opensolaris &#8211; I do! &#8211; but the problem I run into there is still a lack of third-party or community support (so far). Skype? Flash? Webex? </p>
<p>@192.18.101.5 &#8211; You are right, I really don&#8217;t care about application &quot;bitness&quot; if it&#8217;s not using &gt;4G of RAM (and nothing should on this box!). It&#8217;s the &quot;new source of instability&quot; that I mind. Maybe it&#8217;s 32bit Skype accessing a 64bit Video4Linux layer &#8211; I don&#8217;t pretend to know. But more things broke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I second the first anon poster.  It&#039;s nice that you comment on OpenSuse and Fedora, but you really ought to try OpenSolaris as well -- you&#039;ll like what you see, provided that you first understand that just because the kernel is 64-bit doesn&#039;t mean that all apps should also be 64-bit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also second Phillip Wagstrom -- what&#039;s crucial is that the *kernel* run in 64-bit mode and that apps that would benefit from being 64-bit also be 64-bit.  I don&#039;t see why Skype needs to be 64-bit, for example -- can you clarify?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the first anon poster.  It&#8217;s nice that you comment on OpenSuse and Fedora, but you really ought to try OpenSolaris as well &#8212; you&#8217;ll like what you see, provided that you first understand that just because the kernel is 64-bit doesn&#8217;t mean that all apps should also be 64-bit.</p>
<p>I also second Phillip Wagstrom &#8212; what&#8217;s crucial is that the *kernel* run in 64-bit mode and that apps that would benefit from being 64-bit also be 64-bit.  I don&#8217;t see why Skype needs to be 64-bit, for example &#8212; can you clarify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Wagstrom</title>
		<link>http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Wagstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And run 64-bit along with 32-bit applications all at the same time.  None of this 64-bit only or 32-bit only nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And run 64-bit along with 32-bit applications all at the same time.  None of this 64-bit only or 32-bit only nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldgonemad.com/blogs/pantoniades/2009/02/is-the-64bit-desktop-really-still-so-far-off/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, if you ran your employer&#039;s product you&#039;d already be able to use all that memory.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, if you ran your employer&#8217;s product you&#8217;d already be able to use all that memory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
